Disengagement, EXPULSION, OR WHAT?
We, the Jews, were in exile for almost two
thousand years, but before that, we had a long period of trying to
govern Israel. For the most part, even those times are not a happy
story. We’ve had more than our share of overly ambitious or weak
leaders, of betrayal from some Palestinians in our midst, and of
fighting each other. Today we have again a dangerous combination of
weaknesses. This history and the present are particularly sad for a
state that was supposed to be a light to the world by setting a utopian
example.
We’ve had the current state
of Israel for less than sixty years, a very short period, historically
speaking. In a few more decades we can easily lose it again. It won’t
happen because we can’t respond to a concentrated external threat. It
can happen by a graduate
erosion of our strength, caused by a combination of the
more subtle problems I mentioned above. We are at a very dangerous
stage. Again, the outside pressures in the form of terrorism, Iran, or
the Moslem world are great, but they are not the greatest dangers facing
us. Our problems are internal and we don’t have much time to “get our
act together”.
The disengagement/expulsion from Gaza,
and most recently the ugly skirmish at Amona, are symptoms
of the serious illness that has beset Israel. Let’s
look at the three previously-mentioned aggravating factors,
lack of honest leadership, subversion, and infighting.
Disengagement or moving to more easily defensible
positions is not a bad idea in my opinion, but unfortunately that’s
where the good ideas of Sharon end. His manner of moving toward this
goal could not have been done in a more tyrannical way. Here is a man
who respects no one and nothing, certainly not the platform and the
party that put him in power. These, he figured, could be abandoned after
they no longer served his visions, i.e. his ambitions. He feels his
abilities are giant and his good intentions outweigh his heavy-handed
means. He loves this game of politics. He considers a referendum
dangerous; it’s much easier to play the coalition game. Find the group
of legislators that is willing to approve your next move. We have here a
semi-tyrant in a hurry to make his mark on history. Yes, in a hurry and
that is a key fact. It’s sad, but it’s not rare in our history. For
Israel, it’s more than sad: it’s dangerous.
The big question in my mind is:
what’s the rush. Why not have a full debate in Israeli
society, over a period of years, about the lines of defense?
The rush is Sharon’s, the rush results from the age
and health of an elderly man and of a few elderly allies (like
Peres, for example). It’s not like the Palestinians
are ready to reciprocate in any way. They are nowhere near
ready to be peace partners. Now it looks like that day will
be moved back significantly with the election of a Hamas government.
So Israel could have taken and could take its time for a national
discussion.
The settlements in Gaza could
have been moved into a more defensible configuration if Sharon had
sought a compromise. Of course, compromise has not been in his
vocabulary for some time. You certainly don’t give away Gaza and get
nothing in return. In fact we know that Israeli security has been hurt
by these evacuations, with rocket launches from that region and arms and
terrorists entering from Egypt. What intelligent person could not have
foreseen these developments, never mind a former military general. There
is no escaping the conclusion that Sharon gambled with his country’s
security so that his single-minded map-drawing would get completed.
Continuing with the theme of
leadership, or lack thereof, we find the equally dangerous Olmert
currently at the helm. He tries to follow his mentor’s course, but has
no clue where it will get the country. It appears to me, that he has no
leadership capability and will tend to be blown about by the winds of
liberal international opinion. He has no coherent policy toward the
Palestinians or Hamas. He has no guidance for the security establishment
either. Unfortunately the Israeli military has become politicized
(another unfortunate Sharon contribution) and look to the government for
instructions. Instead of defending Israel using their know-how, they do
the politically correct things and try not to hurt the enemy. Is there
anything more pitiful than responding to rocket attacks by shelling the
open fields that the rockets came from? Is this the same army that won
all those wars against terrible odds?
The worst thing is that Olmert wants
to maintain the rapid pace of change. Hoping to fill his mentor’s
shoes, he rushed into an uncompromising and violent confrontation
over Amona. Doesn’t he have enough on his mind trying
to brace the country for a Hamas-governed Palestinian Authority?
Is this the time to bash countrymen using police on horseback?
It would be reasonable to expect well-considered behavior
from a prime minister. Unfortunately what we have here is
a man nobody ever took seriously, a timid man looking over
his shoulder for favorable press and the approval of other
countries. Israel cannot afford to have him in power for several
years. The damage can be enormous.
I haven’t heard of a broad
discussion in the Knesset or in the larger Israeli society about the
territory Israel should keep. Can we have that please, in an unhurried
deliberate way? Of course, there will never be complete agreement among
the various parties but a serious discussion must take place. We cannot
have too many Amonas. We must not handle these things like brutes.
Speaking of brutes, what are
we to do with Israeli Arabs that are into subversion? I’m talking about
those Israeli citizens who help terrorists, agree with the inflexibility
of the Palestinians and cheer their hostility, or openly advocate the
destruction of Israel.
Again, this is nothing new, historically speaking. There
have often been disruptive foreigners in our midst, waiting to betray
us at the first opportunity. This is a group that needs to be watched
and the worst elements need to be deported from Israel. Is that harsh,
is it cruel? That depends on how willing you are to be stabbed in the
back in your own cities. Keeping your country isn’t always pretty. Your
worst enemies need to be kept at a safe distance. If that still does not
work, then it’s your life or theirs, and no amount of wishful thinking
can change that. The Bible is pretty clear. Offer peace but be ready for
war, and wage that in a serious and not half-hearted way.
Now, let’s look at
infighting, Jew versus Jew. This is nothing new unfortunately in Jewish
history either, with one part of the country not willing to defend
another or one group, whether religious, economic, or ethnic, callous
or openly hostile to the interests of the other. We have lost Israel
more than once when unity was severely lacking.
I sense Israelis in the major cities
having little compassion for those in the country, those in
the north giving little thought to the problems of the south,
the religious and the secularists having no patience with
each other, and finally the comfortable unwilling to disturb
themselves over the frontiers. How many have forgotten that
not long ago all of Israel was the frontier, that everyone
was a settler? The Arab world still thinks of the whole country
that way.
I especially am disappointed
by the two ends of the religious spectrum, the very secular and the very
orthodox. The former see the Jewish aspect of Israel’s history and
claims to the land as minor details. They are striving to make Israel
into a mini Europe or America and take their moral or amoral cues from
the West. To them Israel represents a resting place from our wanderings
but any other spot of land would be just fine also. Of course they’ll
defend Israel as their home but these attitudes make me worry about the
country’s long-term future.
The orthodox, on the other
hand can’t agree with each other on anything and would rather see a
competing orthodox group fail than to join together and apply all their
political clout to stop a fiasco like the Gaza operation. They also
can’t take seriously the Jewish people’s having to act again like a
political entity, with all the day-to-day services, like defending the
country, that a living nation requires. Of course all these orthodox
behaviors are contrary to the commandments, many of which concern the
operation of a Jewish state.
The lack of discussion and
empathy between the various components of Isreali society will doom us
for sure. Whether there is an open civil war or whether the hate just
simmers under the surface and leads one group to undo what the other has
worked so hard to do, we will lose this land. Unfortunately this
prospect has not fully registered in Israeli minds or in the minds of
world Jewry. It can and will happen, the second devastating blow for our
people in a period of a hundred years. Will the light to the nations
flicker and die out? It can and will happen unless we adopt an ethically
more sensitive, i.e. back-to-basics Jewish, approach to Israeli life
and government. The history of Israel already contains many sad
mistakes. Must we repeat them in our time?
|